← Back to all publications

VibeProteinBench: An Evaluation Benchmark for Language-interfaced Vibe Protein Design

Hyunjin Seo, Hongjoon Ahn, Jimin Park, Sungjun Han, Gyubok Lee, Soojung Yang, Cheng-Hao Liu, Joseph S. Brown, Chen, Leo, Gina El Nesr, Feyisayo Eweje, Sarah F. Gurev, Hyejin Lee, Junlang Liu, Zhihui Qi, Gyu Rie Lee, Sungsoo Ahn, Jamin Shin, Sangwon Jung

Discovered via OpenAlex

Abstract

Protein design aims to compose amino-acid sequences that fold into stable three-dimensional structures while satisfying targeted functional properties. The field is increasingly shifting toward vibe protein design, where a single model is expected to generate novel sequences, engineer existing proteins, and reason about protein characteristics through flexible natural-language constraints. However, existing benchmarks typically evaluate isolated aspects of protein design or assume predefined structured inputs, making them ill-suited to assess this broad, open-ended setting. To address this gap, we present Vibe Protein Design Benchmark (VibeProteinBench), a language-interfaced benchmark that evaluates whether a single model can operate across three complementary stages of a computational protein-design workflow: recognition, engineering, and generation. Each stage is grounded in expert-curated mechanistic rationales and multi-faceted in silico validation, to computationally verify whether model outputs are biologically plausible. Across diverse general-purpose and domain-specialized LLMs, evaluated with and without tool access, no model performs strongly across all three stages at once. Beyond measuring end-task success, VibeProteinBench exposes where current systems break: we identify recurring failure patterns and characterize how tool-augmented agents select tool arguments. Together, these findings show that vibe protein design remains a substantial open challenge.

Read full article Open PDF View raw RSS